Given the disparities in scientific credibility between the two sides - for instance, here - and the need for the warmists to propagandise, the extra amount is required to overcome the inherent weaknesses in the warmist case.
But there can be no greater illustration of the weaknesses than that fact that the warmists feel threatened by the tiny (relatively) sums contributed to the "deniers". I suppose they feel that, in equivalent terms, the funds are effectively level-pegging.
The Blackboard » Tell me what’s horrible about this.
To Anthony, I say: Congratulations for convincing Heartland to fund a project that might actually permit the public to have access to better graphics than provided by NOAA and which, at least as described in the shocking memo seems to be perfectly legitimate.
Meanwhile, to others: If someone here can explain to me precisely what is horrible or embarrassing about this project, please do so. Is the problem that Anthony got the funding? Or that access to temperature data is a bad thing? Or that what? Because I can’t even begin to guess what is supposed to be horrible about this.
Twitter / @suzyji: Happy birthday Galileo! He ...
Happy birthday Galileo! Here is an update on modern-day flat earthers of @Heartlandinst gu.com/p/35fdf/tw #eg
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment