I'm confused: If scientists are completely uninterested in money, how did Heartland allegedly win the climate debate by buying scientists for $300k, while warmists lost it while splitting up $79 billion in US government money?

Twitter / @Etche_homo: MT @Etche_homo Heartland b ...

MT @Etche_homo Heartland buys anti-climate change "scientists" for $300K: p13 of is.gd/2zhbQ6 #deniergate

Climate Money: The Climate Industry: billion so far – trillions to come | Originals

The US government has spent over $79 billion since 1989 on policies related to climate change, including science and technology research, administration, education campaigns, foreign aid, and tax breaks. Despite the billions: “audits” of the science are left to unpaid volunteers. A dedicated but largely uncoordinated grassroots movement of scientists has sprung up around the globe to test the integrity of the theory and compete with a well funded highly organized climate monopoly. They have exposed major errors.