Friday, April 27, 2012

Climate hoax promoter Michael Ashley: "The problem with people like Morano is that they have a very forceful way of putting their arguments, even though each one of them is wrong"

TV show giving voice to climate sceptics is skewing evidence, scientists say | Environment | guardian.co.uk

"At best, only a couple of per cent of the world's climate scientists query the basic science so having an equal proportion of sceptics on any programme totally biases the debate," said Professor Andy Pittman, co-director of the Climate Change Research Centre at the University of New South Wales.

..."The problem with people like Morano is that they have a very forceful way of putting their arguments, even though each one of them is wrong. Because he comes across as very slick, people believe him," [Michael Ashley] said.

"People watch a programme like this and they think there's a scientific debate. It's a lose, lose situation for climate scientists," he said.

The opinion among scientists may be overwhelmingly one sided, but the Australian public is deeply divided on whether global warming is caused by human activity. Surveys repeatedly show opinion split almost 50:50.

3 comments:

kenneth said...

They, the Warmistas, was going to wage a propaganda-war against the "stupid common man". Via press-release "science".

Morano is just using the same weapon back. With greater success, because he doesnt have to use pseudo science. I can just talk about the numbers. The curves on arctic ice, the polar bear count. And so on, and so on. Forever. Therefore the so called climate "scientists" have lost.

Derfel Cadarn said...

It is only loose loose because science requires facts and the climate change folks don't have any. What they do have they will not share so their "research cannot be verified ,but their telling the truth swear on their Mom. I do not trust therm and without evidence they have nothing.

pyeatte said...

The reason the situation is a lose-lose one for the climate scientists is because they have no case - it's all 100% agenda driven.