Tuesday, April 17, 2012

War Of The Worlds: When Science, Politics Collide | WBUR & NPR

Republican state Rep. Bill Dunn, a sponsor of the Tennessee legislation, believes scientists are being alarmist. He says the law enacted last week does nothing to threaten the teaching of evolution or other science subjects.

"You have to sit there and wonder how they can say they know what happened 100 million years ago and yet, right here in the present day and age with a bill right in front of them, they can't understand it," Dunn says.

Industry, enviros agree: EPA lying about plans for greenhouse gas rules | JunkScience.com

Environmentalists and industry advocates who battle constantly on climate change issues have found common ground.

Both sides agree that U.S. EPA intends to promulgate a rule limiting emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases from existing power plants.

Stop Them, Before They Model Again | The Resilient Earth

Just when it looked like the climate catastrophists had slunk back into well deserved academic obscurity, a new report in the journal Nature Geoscience has resurrected claims of Earth's impending climatic demise. A new computer climate study says to expect increases in temperature of up to 3°C by 2050, confirming or exceed predictions made by the IPCC reports. Can this model based report be considered any more accurate than previous attempts? Have modeling techniques suddenly improved? Or is this report's appearance in a major scientific journal the signal of a renewed round of scaremongering by eco-alarmists?

In these days of faltering economies and tight government spending there still seems to be an infinite amount of funding available to promote ever larger computer based climate studies.

Al's Journal : Crippling New York

The effects of the climate crisis could cripple transportation in New York:

THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: New analysis finds water vapor is a negative feedback

A prior post explains in simple terms why the runaway greenhouse theory is impossible due to the negative feedback from water vapor. A new analysis by physicist Clive Best of the global 5500 station CRUTEM4 database over the past 111 years comes to the same conclusion: feedback from water vapor is negative.

No comments: