Climate Science – Make A Faulty Assumption And Then Toss Evidence Which Doesn’t Fit | Real Science
Sucks when the data doesn’t fit the theory.
NOAA Bozeman, Montana : average(11,-5) = 4 | Real Science
Same mistake – normal rounded down, observed rounded up. I haven’t seen any even/odd pairs which contradict this rule.
Using Earth’s Blessings To Better Mankind and Planet
[David Legates] Yet in the name of “saving the planet” or “preventing cataclysmic climate change,” environmentalists like Suzuki deny developing countries the modern technologies and energy they need to improve their lives and environment – thereby perpetuating high infant mortality, significantly shortened life spans, and greatly decreased quality of life.
Climate alarmism is the rationale for these deadly policies – and that is where political ideology mixes with the new religion of environmentalism. Overstated or non-existent threats to the environment, along with impractical or imaginary ways to prevent the purported threats, are the new scripture on which the adherents develop their theologies and policies for directing and micromanaging the course of human events. Unfortunately, these eco-religionists never encounter (or intentionally avert their eyes from) the misery and devastation that their policies dramatically inflict on the world’s poorest people. That is because they are too concerned with “saving the planet.”
Climate change is making allergies worse | NJ.com
For the past three years, tree pollen has shown up a week earlier than the year before.
NOAA Math In Champaign | Real Science
According to NOAA, the average of seven and five is seven.
Same mistake as everywhere else. They rounded the normal average (62.5) down, and the observed average (68.5) up.
No comments:
Post a Comment