The listing below of peer reviewed studies warms the heart and feeds the brain of every skeptic:
Climate scientists jumped on the news. “I'm very pleased to learn that Peter has been exonerated,” Michael Mann of Penn State told ME. “He's been a tireless champion for an informed discussion about how we deal with the challenges of climate change and diminishing access to clean water. I, for one, welcome him back to that discussion.” Heartland has often gone after Mann’s “hockey stick graph,” which depicts temperatures over the last millennium, including a sharp increase in the recent past.
The mood among climate skeptics was less cheerful. “It appears that the Pacific Institute recognizes no consequences for clearly unethical behavior,” said Marc Morano, publisher of Climate Depot. “It is a sad reflection on the global warming debate that Gleick is hailed as hero by many. Gleick may have actually enhanced his reputation in academia by his low-brow antics.”
This podcast is a sneak peak at the book, with an excerpt from Healing the Earth's interview with feminist author and professor Betsy Hartmann. Titled Gender, Refugees, and the Militarization of Climate Change as a National Security Issue, it looks at the intersections of climate change, patriarchy, refugees, and militarism.
In Oregon, chemist offers GOP a unifying formula - Washington Times
Ever since, Mr. Robinson sees himself as a “show-me-the-evidence” skeptic about things such as the honesty of career politicians and the reliability of scientists who depend on government or industry grants to make a living. Mr. Robinson said he thinks the findings of taxpayer-subsidized experiments too often reflect the prevailing government-liberal-environmental prejudices rather than scientific objectivity.
“I don’t believe in doing scientific research with government money,” he said.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment