He acknowledges that two data points captured many years apart do not tell us anything conclusive. [Tell me again why I'm supposed to believe that CO2 is the explanation for any differences between these two photos?]
First and foremost – obviously you did not provide evidence to back up your assumption that the “existence” of catastrophic anthropogenic climate change is real. That doesn’t mean it does not exist, but I’ll get back to this. It is the key and only real point.