Tuesday, June 26, 2012

‘We don’t believe the ice cores can be interpreted purely as a signal of temperature’ | Watts Up With That?

...But the method — comparing the ratio of oxygen isotopes buried as snow fell over millennia — may not be such a straightforward indicator of air temperature.

“We don’t believe the ice cores can be interpreted purely as a signal of temperature,” says Anders Carlson, a University of Wisconsin–Madison geosciences professor. “You have to consider where the precipitation that formed the ice came from.”

Matthew England compares skeptics to flat-earthers | Climate Nonconformist

Are there thousands of scientists dissenting against the idea that the earth is round? Is the idea of lead paint being dangerous falling apart at the seams? Did the ban on asbestos undercut the very foundation of the economy? This is an absurd comparison, which leads me to question why England is so keen to demonise those that disagree with him. Why is he so keen to advocate and propagandise?

Die Klimazwiebel: Rio+20 - The Hangover

Now the discourse is shifting from one which was dramatizing and alarmist to another one, which has not taken clear shape yet. Politicians may start losing interest in the language game of “saving the planet”, because it turns out to be a counterproductive formula. Monbiot is still engaged in it.

A Sure Fire Sign Of Global Warming Fraud | Real Science

Any paper which includes the words “Since the beginning of satellite measurements” is a red flag that someone is about to start lying to you.

Brendan DeMelle | Heartland Institute, ALEC and More Gearing Up to Undermine Renewable Energy

Countless studies have found that using wind or solar power will reduce emissions of greenhouse gases when they replace fossil fuel powered plants

No comments: