Monday, June 25, 2012

Questioning the Forest et al. (2006) sensitivity study | Climate Etc.

Given the importance of the topic of sensitivity, we need to make sure that the paper has done what it says it has done, is sound methodologically, and that it has been interpreted correctly by the IPCC.

This particular situation raises some thorny issues, that are of particular interest especially in light of the recent report on Open Science from the Royal Society:

Has North Victoria cooled, and is that the ghost of a solar cycle signal we see? « JoNova: Science, carbon, climate and tax

No comments: