John Coleman on the California Cap and Trade Law | Watts Up With That?

Here is what I think. There is no significant man-made global warming. Carbon Dioxide is not a pollutant. It is, however, a very minor greenhouse gas that causes a smidgen of warming, but not enough to create any problem. So we are going to further wreck the economy of California to save us from a non-problem. And, even if we totally eliminated CO2 releases in California we would only cut the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by less than 1 percent. All of the rest of the World produces over 99 percent of the carbon dioxide in the air, and the atmosphere knows no state boundaries.

So the Cap and Trade is really bad idea, based on faulty science and about to increase the cost of living for the typical California family of four by as much as $4,500 a year.

Maldives Not Planning On Drowning After All! | Real Science

They have an expensive airport to pay for, and are looking for some really stupid western countries to shell out global warming mea culpa cash.

Errors in IPCC climate science » Blog Archive » Essential work at ClimateAudit.org not appreciated by some

Warning Signs: Ethanol and Corn: The Power of a Really Bad Idea

If we got rid of the ethanol mandate tomorrow our cars would last longer and drive farther. Since they are on our roads and streets anyway, does anyone really believe that air quality would be significant affected?

So ethanol, like communism and environmentalism, is yet one more very bad idea that is backed by the power of government mandates that benefit its growers, but does little else of any value for consumers.