The Odds Of The USHCN Adjustments Being Correct? One Out Of Infinity | Real Science

So what are the odds of 840 months in a row having temperatures which were read too low by thousands of observers? Two raised to the 840th power. For all practical purposes, that number is infinity.

In other words, there is a 0% chance that the USHCN adjustments are correct, and 100% probability that they are politically motivated, or at best conformation bias.

Why They Are Rewriting History | Real Science

The key to pulling off this scam is to convince people that bad weather never happened in the past, and the key to pulling that off is to erase the records of bad weather from the past.  NOAA pretends that that people didn’t know how to count before 1950, and didn’t know how to read thermometers before 2000. NSIDC pretends that there were no satellites before 1979. Data from before 1970 is largely ignored by government climate scientists.

For the greater good of the team, it is also critically important to rewrite the temperature records from the past, which GISS and NOAA have been doing furiously for the past 12 years.

Staff cuts sound 'death knell' for atmospheric observatory : Nature News & Comment

But last week, New Zealand's National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), the government-owned company that administers the lab, told Lauder staff that it planned to axe all three of the site's atmospheric-scientist positions. The cuts, which follow a reprioritization of activities by NIWA, would seem to leave Lauder's extensive measurement operations in the hands of five technicians. Two climate modellers and a mathematician are also understood to remain.

Smoking Gun That GISS Temperatures Are Garbage | Real Science

The old versions of GISS were correct, before the data was altered. The 1930s were much hotter. People who rewrite history are criminals.