Fighting the Good Fight | Planet3.0
where is the published, peer-reviewed scientific evidence that refutes the theory?Popular Technology.net: 1100+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarm
WARNING: Do not accept any criticisms of this list without first reading the rebuttals or emailing, populartechnology (at) gmail (dot) comQuadrant Online - Queen of Climate Consensus,
According to Oreskes, Lewandowsky was “the driver behind bringing me back to Perth.” Why has anthropogenic global warming (AGW) been embraced so passionately by the social sciences? Why have so many academic psychologists, environmentalists, ethicists, etc, become Oreskian merchants of climate “certainty”; branding those who question the orthodoxy as political stooges, “deniers”, “pseudo-sceptics” or “fools”? Why, indeed?NASA’s James Hansen is just wrong: Proof that there is no increased drought in the USA tied to temperature | Watts Up With That?
From the James Hansen is just wrong department comes some inconvenient data, data that Dr. Hansen or anyone in the media could have easily looked up for themselvesEl Niño exerts a deadly effect : Nature News & Comment
El Niño events, which displace warm water into the eastern Pacific Ocean and produce cool waters near Indonesia, exert their effect by suppressing the monsoon rains that usually put a dampener on the use of fire to clear land for agriculture. The resulting additional pollution can account for as many as 15,000 deaths in El Niño years, the study says.
Posts
1 comment:
I pointlessly posted this to Planet3.0 (Since he deletes more than RC).
intrepid_wanders says:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
August 12, 2012 at 5:39 pm
One problem Michael. Your boilerplate states:
“Further, no national or major scientific organizations or institutions anywhere in the world dispute the reality of man-caused global warming and the risks it poses.”
and in fact, this is untrue, according to the Russian Academy of Sciences.
“Moreover, according to research conducted by employees of Dolgoprudny Research Station of the Institute together with colleagues from Central and Upper-Air Observatory Hydromet Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, the process of global cooling has begun. After a peak in 2005, the year is now the average temperature on Earth has decreased by 0.3 degrees and returned to the level of 1996-1997-second period. By the year 2015, scientists believe, it will fall a further one and a half tenths of a degree, which corresponds to the climate of the early 80-ies. The year 2020 has already make the inhabitants of northern latitudes to remember the harsh winters of 1978 and 1979, years, and in 2040 th year of the planet will begin to “freeze.” However, only a relatively high temperature mark for the period from 1880 to 2006-th year. Then we can expect a decrease of temperature of 0.5 degrees Celsius compared with the current measure of “global thermometer”.
As revealed in the course of studies, the cause of such climate change is not related to the activities of human civilization in general is … space. The fact that the Earth’s atmosphere is constantly get cosmic dust particles, the scientists explained. According to various observations, the amount of precipitated dust varies from 400 to 1000 tons per day.”
http://www.ras.ru/news/shownews.aspx?id=6f0db8a9-57b4-46df-873b-8d506922c6b6#content
Post a Comment