New Consensus On Climate Change | The Diane Rehm Show from WAMU and NPR

Guests
Juliet Eilperin
national environmental reporter for The Washington Post and author of "Demon Fish: Travels Through the Hidden World of Sharks."
Michael MacCracken
chief scientist at Climate Institute and lead editor for the book “Sudden and Disruptive Climate Change: Exploring the Real Risks and How We Can Avoid Them.”
Richard Muller
professor of physics at the University of California, Berkeley, and author of "Energy for Future Presidents: The Science Behind the Headlines."

Twitter / BigJoeBastardi: BTW I am waiting for NYT,WAPO ...

BTW I am waiting for NYT,WAPO etc etc ro tell us why in parts of the plains, the August may balance out the July temp wise Could be close

CO2 Science

So what did Kysely and Plavcova find? Just as in the case of developed countries, they found declining mortality trends in spite of rising temperature trends, which is just the opposite of what the world's climate alarmists claim will occur in response to global warming.

Global Warming Effects: Human Beings Are Not Fit to Control the Planet

Juan Pablo Laso is a writer of fiction and poetry.

Twitter disappears Bill McKibben commentary on #poisonedweather | Watts Up With That?

[Bastardi] I would love to have a few of us get on a stage in a nationally televised debate agains Mann, Mckibben Hansen, Muller, Cullen and wipe the floor with them with past weather events linked to the large scale natural drivers that caused them. Its like they are weather voyeurs, they peak in on the weather when it suits their purpose. I believe they either have no idea of what they are talking about, or they do and would never be able to defend it. Heck I dont even have to be part of the debate, I would just love to sit there and watch a bunch of people I know could clean them out and end this.

Dont kid yourself. This yelling across the fence at each other does are side no good. They must be confronted in a public forum where they can be exposed for what they are, people who will say anything to justify a view that prostitutes science, not uses to search for the correct answer.

Competition brings out the best and exposes the weakness. This is what is needed, not the games that are played now while the EPA and others continue to tighten their grip based on a ghost driven agenda that has nothing to do with science