Vahrenholt Buries Another Climate Scientist In Debate – Claims IPCC Scientists “Have Colossally Exaggerated Warming”
Needless to say the atmosphere was electrified, with an audience of almost 400. Unfortunately there still is no video of this debate, but the online Berner Zeitung daily (BZ) of Bern wrote up a report, and yes, they too had to concede that skeptic Vahrenholt won the debate.The SkS “Link” to the Lewandowsky Survey « Climate Audit
The BZ called Vahrenholt “rhetorically tough” and wrote he needed “only 10 seconds to warm up his argumentation machinery”.
In my opinion, the evidence is overwhelming that SkS never published a link to the Lewandowsky survey. In my opinion, both Cook’s claim to have published a link and Lewandowsky’s claim to have seen it are untrue. But even if Cook did post a link and then destroyed all documentary evidence of its existence, the situation is equally unpalatable.Are we cooling the planet with SO2? « sunshine hours
Could it be that if there was no human SO2 it the atmosphere the temperature recovery from the Little Ice Age could have been as high as 4C instead of the .8C claimed?Al's Journal : Denier Conspiracy Buffs
Maybe all that coal China is burning is saving our planet!
A new study links climate denial to belief in conspiracy theories:
No comments:
Post a Comment