Why did PBS FRONTLINE electronically alter the signature of one of the world’s most distinguished Physicists in their report “Climate of Doubt’? | Watts Up With That?

It freed him to work on other things than additional research, plus when blurred it fit his narrative, which in my opinion was that “skeptics were bad people doing bad things“.

Watch the video from 20:30 to 20:50 and you’ll see what I mean. Here’s the voice over after the next hatchet job on Dr. Singer’s responses:

It a time-honored tactic by the skeptics, authentic looking documents and reports that don’t stand up to independent scrutiny.

I call bullshit on that, especially when the PBS report purposely alters the documents to prevent most viewers unfamiliar with the issue of figuring out they’ve been lied to by the reporter. It’s PBS journalistic ethics that don’t stand up to scrutiny here.

It makes you wonder what else Hockenberry may have purposely altered in post production.

It is clear to me that Hockenberry simply didn’t want viewers to know that such a prominent and world-renowned physicist had signed on saying he had “doubt” about global warming. That would dilute Hockenberry’s message.

Climate and State High Temperature Records – Where’s the Beef? | Watts Up With That?

The summer of 2012 is now over and all temperature data recorded. Guess how many states set new state high-temperature records in 2012? None! According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), not one of our 50 states set a new state high temperature record in 2012...

The NO CARBON TAX Climate Sceptics Blog: Is dangerous AGW caused by humanity's carbon dioxide emissions? NO!

The question should be:

"Is dangerous Global Warming Happening? And is it driven by Human Carbon Dioxide Emissions?"

Perverse environmentalist oil sands ethics

Canada’s oil sands (and the Keystone Pipeline that will bring their petroleum to the United States) must be evaluated on environmental and ethical grounds that compare them to real world alternatives to them – not to some utopian energy resource that exists only in the minds of idealists, ideologues and special interest environmental pressure groups.