Why hasn’t there been a real debate on climate science? « Pointman's
After two decades of scary predictions, the ordinary person is fed up of the global warming story. They no longer care about it and are becoming deafer by the day to the increasingly hysterical predictions of Armageddon. Though there are other reasons, that loss of concern is what is giving politicians a mandate to start the financial demolition of the house of cards that global warming built. The dustbin of history awaits it.Evil Fossil Fuels Needed In New York | Real Science
Engaging in and losing any meaningful public debate, would only hasten that process. It is only by rigidly enforcing conformity to the consensus and refusing to engage in any debate, that the big lie can stay safely hidden.
Bloomberg said earlier this week that burning fossil fuels caused New York’s problems, while residents of New York are dying for lack of fossil fuels.Scientific fraud is rife: it's time to stand up for good science | Pete Etchells and Suzi Gage | Science | guardian.co.uk
The way we fund and publish science encourages fraud. A forum about academic misconduct aims to find practical solutions [Via Climate Realists]Surprise snow blasts Britain - Despite none in the forecast
Several inches of snow fell on parts of the West Country despite none being forecast in the region.Al's Journal : The Oil Boom's Impact
...“In the world today, global warming is our collective cancer, and despite dire and clear warnings, the oil industry is still smoking away."
No comments:
Post a Comment