Top Climate Scientists Urge Obama To Reject Keystone XL Pipeline, Warn Approval Would 'Undermine Your Legacy' | ThinkProgress
As you may know, the [these careful, esteemed scientists forgot the word "continental"; they also forgot to mention the extensive fudging/fraud that was necessary to make this record possible] U.S. has just recorded the hottest year in its history, beating the old mark by a full degree...the year of review that you asked for on the project made it clear exactly how pressing the climate issue really is.So a year ago, it *wasn't* clear how pressing the climate issue allegedly really is?
Posts
1 comment:
Carbon dioxide is no blanket. The "blanket" is produced by non-radiative diffusion processes primarily involving nitrogen and oxygen at the surface-atmosphere boundary. If the only consideration were the effect of water vapour and carbon dioxide you'd be sleeping under a handkerchief.
Discover "The 21st Century New Paradigm in Climate Change Science" (on the Principia Scientific International website) and discover what real physics has now proved, completely negating any significant relevance of the old 20th Century radiative greenhouse concept.
No back radiation caused the Earth's surface to be 288K (or the Venus surface to be over 730K) all on its own, somehow multiplying the Sun's energy. What did cause it was the temperature distribution brought about by diffusion of kinetic energy in a gravitational field, and this process continues to maintain surface temperatures as atmospheres absorb direct incident Solar radiation, the only possible radiation that can keep them at the observed temperatures. For more detail read “Planetary Surface Temperatures. A Discussion of Alternative Mechanisms” published by PSI in November 2012, as well as this week's article mentioned above.
Post a Comment