The Reference Frame: Engineers, geoscientists: only 36% believe in CAGW
You see that only 36% agree with the positions that are often presented as inseparable parts of the "consensus". In other words, one may pretty much say that there is a consensus among the experts – except that the consensus says the opposite than what is often being said.Twitter / BjornLomborg: Senate: carbon fee2fund ...
A year ago, similar views were found among meteorologists.
Senate: carbon fee2fund investment in green energy. Please, please, please: use for R&D (smart), not subsidies (dumb) http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=e20c6477-23dc-4a63-8fe9-e5b0c92d395b …Obama’s Agenda Seen as Dead in the Water by Republicans - Bloomberg
“Minimum wage won’t pass the House, climate-change won’t pass the House,” Thune said. “Those are things he would probably have a hard time getting a lot of Democrats to vote for.”Ex-IPCC head: Prepare for 5°C warmer world — The Daily Climate
More species would be facing extinction (10 percent of species are thought to be at risk for every 1°C of warming), there would be more (and more intense) extreme weather, and a growing risk of abrupt and major irreversible changes in the climate system.73.6% of all Statistics are Made Up
No comments:
Post a Comment