Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Mr. FOIA speaks: "It's time to tie up loose ends and dispel some of the speculation surrounding the Climategate affair"

I've received the following unsolicited email from a person unknown to me:
========
Subject:  FOIA 2013: the password

It's time to tie up loose ends and dispel some of the speculation surrounding the Climategate affair.

Indeed, it's singular "I" this time.  After certain career developments I can no longer use the papal plural ;-)

If this email seems slightly disjointed it's probably my linguistic background and the problem of trying to address both the wider audience (I expect this will be partially reproduced sooner or later) and the email recipients (whom I haven't decided yet on).

The "all.7z" password is [redacted]

DO NOT PUBLISH THE PASSWORD.  Quote other parts if you like.

Releasing the encrypted archive was a mere practicality.  I didn't want to keep the emails lying around.

I prepared CG1 & 2 alone.  Even skimming through all 220.000 emails would have taken several more months of work in an increasingly unfavorable environment.

Dumping them all into the public domain would be the last resort.  Majority of the emails are irrelevant, some of them probably sensitive and socially damaging.

To get the remaining scientifically (or otherwise) relevant emails out,  I ask you to pass this on to any motivated and responsible individuals who could volunteer some time to sift through the material for eventual release.

Filtering\redacting personally sensitive emails doesn't require special expertise.

I'm not entirely comfortable sending the password around unsolicited, but haven't got better ideas at the moment.  If you feel this makes you seemingly "complicit" in a way you don't like, don't take action.

I don't expect these remaining emails to hold big surprises.  Yet it's possible that the most important pieces are among them.  Nobody on the planet has held the archive in plaintext since CG2.

That's right; no conspiracy, no paid hackers, no Big Oil.  The Republicans didn't plot this.  USA politics is alien to me, neither am I from the UK.  There is life outside the Anglo-American sphere.

If someone is still wondering why anyone would take these risks, or sees only a breach of privacy here, a few words...

The first glimpses I got behind the scenes did little to  garner my trust in the state of climate science -- on the contrary.  I found myself in front of a choice that just might have a global impact.

Briefly put, when I had to balance the interests of my own safety, privacy\career of a few scientists, and the well-being of billions of people living in the coming several decades, the first two weren't the decisive concern.

It was me or nobody, now or never.  Combination of several rather improbable prerequisites just wouldn't occur again for anyone else in the foreseeable future.  The circus was about to arrive in Copenhagen.  Later on it could be too late.

Most would agree that climate science has already directed where humanity puts its capability, innovation, mental and material "might".  The scale will grow ever grander in the coming decades if things go according to script.  We're dealing with $trillions and potentially drastic influence on practically everyone.

Wealth of the surrounding society tends to draw the major brushstrokes of a newborn's future life.  It makes a huge difference whether humanity uses its assets to achieve progress, or whether it strives to stop and reverse it, essentially sacrificing the less fortunate to the climate gods.

We can't pour trillions in this massive hole-digging-and-filling-up endeavor and pretend it's not away from something and someone else.

If the economy of a region, a country, a city, etc.  deteriorates, what happens among the poorest? Does that usually improve their prospects? No, they will take the hardest hit.  No amount of magical climate thinking can turn this one upside-down.

It's easy for many of us in the western world to accept a tiny green inconvenience and then wallow in that righteous feeling, surrounded by our "clean" technology and energy that is only slightly more expensive if adequately subsidized.

Those millions and billions already struggling with malnutrition, sickness, violence, illiteracy, etc.  don't have that luxury.  The price of "climate protection" with its cumulative and collateral effects is bound to destroy and debilitate in great numbers, for decades and generations.

Conversely, a "game-changer" could have a beneficial effect encompassing a similar scope.

If I had a chance to accomplish even a fraction of that, I'd have to try.  I couldn't morally afford inaction.  Even if I risked everything, would never get personal compensation, and could probably never talk about it with anyone.

I took what I deemed the most defensible course of action, and would do it again (although with slight alterations -- trying to publish something truthful on RealClimate was clearly too grandiose of a plan ;-).

Even if I have it all wrong and these scientists had some good reason to mislead us (instead of making a strong case with real data) I think disseminating the truth is still the safest bet by far.

Big thanks to Steve and Anthony and many others.  My contribution would never have happened without your work (whether or not you agree with the views stated).

Oh, one more thing.  I was surprised to learn from a "progressive" blog, corroborated by a renowned "scientist", that the releases were part of a coordinated campaign receiving vast amounts of secret funding from shady energy industry groups.

I wasn't aware of the arrangement but warmly welcome their decision to support my project.  For that end I opened a bitcoin address: 1HHQ36qbsgGZWLPmiUjYHxQUPJ6EQXVJFS.

More seriously speaking, I accept, with gratitude, modest donations to support The (other) Cause.  The address can also serve as a digital signature to ward off those identity thefts which are part of climate scientists' repertoire of tricks these days.

Keep on the good work.  I won't be able to use this email address for long so if you reply, I can't guarantee reading or answering.  I will several batches, to anyone I can think of.

Over and out.

Mr. FOIA
========
 Update from Tom:  Yes, the provided password does open all.7z. 

Update 2:  I'm told that "The zip archive contains at least 21 viruses and counting. Please alert others as they are various and of different types. Not all virus software may detect them. "

16 comments:

TLITB said...

Simplest question. Does the redacted password open the zip file?

TLITB said...

Simplest question. Does the redacted password open the zip file?

Tom said...

Yes.

Anonymous said...

Wow

~ Donna Laframboise

TLITB said...

Cheers

tallbloke said...

Tom,
forward the email please.
After what I went through, I think I can make that call. :-)

skwilli said...

Will Michael Mann be making a statement? hee hee hee

Latimer Alder said...

Happy to help and I have a bit of free time coming up.

Let me know what I need to do to assist.

tallbloke said...

fast service sir, many thanks - Rog TB

Hugh K said...

The hero is commonly the simplest and obscurest of men.--Henry David Thoreau

Russell C said...

" ... surprised to learn from a "progressive" blog, corroborated by a renowned "scientist", that the releases were part of a coordinated campaign receiving vast amounts of secret funding from shady energy industry groups. ..."

Wait for it. This particular sentence will be taken out of context by the progressive blogs and trumpeted as an admission that the effort WAS part of a coordinated campaign receiving vast amounts of secret industry funding, and that the 'renowned scientist' is no less than Rajendra Pachauri himself, as noted in paragraph 9 of this 2009 UK Times article: http://web.archive.org/web/20110429053143/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6938298.ece

Anonymous said...

any attachments to the e-mails?

David said...

I've been mining this sewer for years, happy to volunteer if you need help sifting through the new material, also trained in law so can spot the doozies a mile off and put them to one side for the special pile.

Anonymous said...

From unborn millions in future generations, from a billion still living in abject poverty in the developing world, and from me personally - on my own similar crusade against all misanthropic forms of neo-environmentalism - I sincerely thank this person.

You are a hero to future generations who owe you a debt of gratitude but will never even know who you are.

David L. Hagen said...

Tom
Re viruses,
"REPLY: This was scanned checked by many people, no such virii has been seen. Must be an issue local to you – Anthony"
see WUWT climategate-3-0-has-occurred-the-password-has-been-released
comment-1247149

Tom said...

If you'd like to help with the sifting effort, please email me.