The models are broken, by the standards warmists set | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

But when Brozek checks for statistically significant warming, the warming pause extends by every measure to more than 15 years:

For RSS the warming is not significant for over 23 years…

For UAH the warming is not significant for over 19 years…

For Hadcrut3 the warming is not significant for over 19 years…

For Hadcrut4 the warming is not significant for over 18 years…

For GISS the warming is not significant for over 17 years...

Once warmists said 15 years of no statistically significant warming invalidated their models. Draw your own conclusions.

Can Global Warmist Get Their Story Straight? - Marita Noon

Two of catastrophic climate change’s staunchest supporters have been out on the stump promoting their cause—with conflicting statements.

Van Jones: Keystone XL a ‘planet cooker’ | JunkScience.com

Sounds rational to me.

ESA’s climate-eye dilemma : Nature News & Comment

Around 250 Earth scientists and climate researchers will meet in Graz, Austria, this week to weigh up the scientific benefits of projects proposed for the roughly €300-million (US$390-million) seventh Earth Explorer mission of the European Space Agency (ESA).  [But isn't there some new-fangled technology available so that people don't have to fly in allegedly planet-killing planes in order to communicate with one another?]