This is hilarious: Warmist Bob Ward argues that former IPCC lead author Richard Lindzen isn't qualified to talk about climate science

Twitter / ret_ward: .@mehdirhasan But why have ...

Bob Ward ‏@ret_ward .@mehdirhasan Yet another example of the media hosting a falsely balanced debate about climate science instead of covering the real issues.
Mehdi Hasan Mehdi Hasan ‏@mehdirhasan  @ret_ward 1) Not true at all. Its not a 'balanced debate'. Its a fair but tough interrogation of his views. I'm not neutral on this.
Bob Ward Bob Ward ‏@ret_ward .@mehdirhasan But why have you made Lindzen the focus of the debate? He no longer contributes to the science and is irrelevant to policy.
Mehdi Hasan Mehdi Hasan ‏@mehdirhasan  @ret_ward But he's not irrelevant to the world, is he? You (and me) not liking his views doesn't make him disappear, does it? Or his claims?
Mehdi Hasan Mehdi Hasan ‏@mehdirhasan @ret_ward Which 'sceptic' would you like me to interview? He's more credible than the rest. Or is your position, no intvs with them, ever?
Ben Pile Ben Pile ‏@clim8resistance Oh, look, Bob Ward @ret_ward trying to close down debate and discussion again. The self-appointed censor has no shame. @mehdirhasan

Richard Lindzen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Richard Siegmund Lindzen (born February 8, 1940) is an American atmospheric physicist and Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Lindzen is known for his work in the dynamics of the middle atmosphere, atmospheric tides and ozone photochemistry. He has published more than 200 scientific papers and books.[1] He was a lead author of Chapter 7, 'Physical Climate Processes and Feedbacks,' of the IPCC Third Assessment Report on climate change.