97.1% Of Scientists Agree That The Climate Can’t Change Without Human Intervention | Real Science
The climate was stable for the last 4.6 billion years – prior to humans increasing atmospheric CO2 by 0.0001 mole fraction.Cook’s fallacy “97% consensus” study is a marketing ploy some journalists will fall for « JoNova
What does a study of 20 years of abstracts tell us about the global climate? Nothing. But it says quite a lot about the way government funding influences the scientific process.April U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 9.2 F COOLER in 100 years | UD/RK Samhälls Debatt
John Cook, a blogger who runs the site with the ambush title “SkepticalScience” (which unskeptically defends the mainstream position), has tried to revive the put-down and smear strategy against the thousands of scientists who disagree. The new paper confounds climate research with financial forces, is based on the wrong assumptions, uses fallacious reasoning, wasn’t independent, and confuses a consensus of climate scientists for a scientific consensus, not that a consensus proves anything anyway, if it existed.
Given the monopolistic funding of climate science in the last 20 years, the results he finds are entirely predictable.
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..Australia’s ABC comes round to what we said on WUWT years ago | Watts Up With That?
So the “warming trend” 2000-2013 for April is exactly - 0.92 F degrees a decade. That is a - 9.2 F COOLER in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
And as I and others have pointed out, the sea level scare is just another money making enterprise, as evidenced by the increase in airport expansion, among other things.
No comments:
Post a Comment