Links

The Reference Frame: William Happer on CNBC

This is what Princeton physicist Prof Will Happer was allowed to point out on TV – and it wasn't even Fox News! ;-)

400 ppm of CO2 is nothing special, 1,000 ppm of CO2 would be beneficial for the productivity of agriculture – which has already gone up a little bit, thanks to the slightly increased CO2 levels. The Earth has seen concentrations as high as 4,000 ppm or higher. It wasn't during the era of humans – but the era of humans is a tiny fraction of the Earth's history and when CO2 was around 4,000 ppm, our primate ancestors – whose physiology and climatic preferences don't really differ from ours – were already alive.

New paper shows transient climate response less than 2°C | Watts Up With That?

New energy-budget-derived estimates of climate sensitivity and transient response in Nature Geoscience

No Correlation Between CO2 And US Temperature | Real Science

Even if climate alarmists succeeded in reducing CO2 to 350 ppm through massive genocide and destruction of the world’s infrastructure, they would do nothing for the climate.

Nenana Ice Classic, data | Tallbloke's Talkshop