Twitter / PeterGleick
We must stop assuming our political stability is independent of what we do to ourTwitter / RogerPielkeJr: On Europe/floods-->Barredo ...#climate or#water. It isn’t. http://scienceblogs.com/significantfigures/index.php/2013/06/10/syria-water-climate-change-and-violent-conflict/ …
On Europe/floods-->Barredo 2009 "there is no evidence of a clear positive trend in normalised flood losses in Europe" http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/9/97/2009/nhess-9-97-2009.pdf …NY Times: It’s Not Getting Warmer, We Don’t Know Why, But We SWEAR It’s Going to Get Warmer Soon | Climate Depot
'The bad news is (according to the climate change hoaxers) It's going to start getting warmer again, one day --they promise-- cross their hearts hope to die stick a needle in their eye, and this time they really truly mean it!' -- Dr Don Easterbrook, who has published over 150 peer-reviewed scientific studies, warns that a destructive world-wide climate change us upon us. Easterbrook says we should expect global cooling for the next 2-3 decades that will be far more damaging than global warming would have been. He bases his prediction on looking at temperature changes ever the past 500 years...Hold on to your winter coats just a bit longer Dr Habibullo Abdussamatov from the St. Petersburg Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory agrees. The good Doctor says we are heading toward a long period of climate change, and not the kind that Al Gore is getting rich from'Twitter / RogerPielkeJr: Wow->US gov't estimates ...
Wow->US gov't estimates of US shale oil reserves goes fro 32 to 58B barrels. First US global estimate at 345B barrels http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/4b831ffc-d1e1-11e2-9336-00144feab7de.html …Warmists Wonder: Can social cost of carbon be used to stop the Keystone XL? | JunkScience.com
Dunno… are the real benefits > the imaginary social cost of carbon?
No comments:
Post a Comment