Chukchi polar bear status contradicts the “message” – new details | polarbearscience
[In other words, this is a big problem – how do polar bear biologists maintain the “message” they wish to present to the public that global warming is harming polar bears by diminishing their habitat when the evidence not only refutes it, but proves the opposite – that some bears do better with less ice]Heartland’s Jay Lehr Talking Energy, Environment, and Ag Issues on WIBW | Somewhat Reasonable
A pull quote from Jay:If we burn wood for energy, we can't have our cake and eat it
To think that man is more powerful than nature is ludicrous.
In my opinion, policies promoting wood bioenergy have developed quicker than the science that examines the potential tradeoffs, net effects, and consequences1815, 1816 and 1817; A POLAR PUZZLE | Watts Up With That?
Volcanoes cause cooling, right? No.Three future energy megatrends, but where's climate change? | Carbon Brief
Companies are waiting to be convinced that the world is serious about climate change. It doesn't look like the world is serious about climate change