Wednesday, August 14, 2013


Inhofe Investigates White House Apparent Coordination with Campaign on Climate Change Agenda
“The Obama Administration’s apparent coordination with the campaign arm and the White House leave me no choice but to investigate,” said Inhofe. “I also find it quite interesting that to end this week of coincidental events on climate change alarmism, certain liberal media is showing a climate change special with reportedly no interviews from those challenging the theory. There seems to be a coincidental coordination between the White House, the President’s campaign, and the liberal media that is weaving a false and potentially harmful narrative of alarmism. This agenda will leave our nation less secure, less prosperous and less informed. Just as the OFA has called for light to be shed on members of Congress not in lockstep with the President’s agenda, I will work to shed light on the coincidence of coordination in the Obama Administration we continue to see unfold.”
The NO CARBON TAX Climate Sceptics Blog: AGW lies, Hiroshima and academics.
The salient point about this is if the ocean surface is cooling how can heat be moving past the surface and going to the ocean depths?
THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: New paper finds no increase of deep cyclones in Europe over past 110 years
A new paper published in the International Journal of Climatology finds no evidence of any increase of the frequency of deep cyclones over central Europe from 1900-2010. Contrary to the claims of climate alarmists, many peer-reviewed papers have documented a decrease in the frequency of cyclones or hurricanes, with little to no change of intensity, and project fewer hurricanes/cyclones in the future.
EPA chief: Destroying the coal industry ‘not a scary thing to do’ |
[McCarthy] they are actions that benefit everybody
Die Klimazwiebel: Science for a good cause?
Imagine the following scenario. An atmospheric scientist makes a discovery that seems to challenge a particular model of sea level increase due to global warming. She expects her discovery will be refined through further research, and that, in the end, it will not refute the mainstream view. In the meantime, she wants to avoid giving ammunition to climate skeptics, so she postpones publication. But an ambitious postdoc surreptitiously informs the media about the discovery. The media accuse the scientist of a cover-up and report that key evidence for anthropogenic climate change has been refuted.

No comments: