Editorial: Our Opinion - TimesDispatch.com
By making unsupportable claims that deniers and skeptics can easily knock down, the alarmists undermine their own case.How colour changes our climate - Telegraph
differences between sombre and sparkling objects in sunlight are of real importance to [students'] futureTwitter / UN_ClimateTalks: The #UNFCCC Negotiator App ...
TheHarvard-Smithsonian global warming skeptic helps feed strategy of doubt, gridlock in Congress - Politics - The Boston Globe
#UNFCCC Negotiator App for #COP19 is now available. Check it out: http://bit.ly/Tho7YZ
Published in two separate peer-reviewed journals, the [Soon/Baliunas] paper contained an acknowledgment: part of the research funding came from the American Petroleum Institute, the oil industry’s lobbying arm in Washington.
Michael Mann, a prominent climate researcher who performed crucial temperature studies at the University of Massachusetts Amherst during the 1990s and is now a professor at Pennsylvania State University, said he was surprised when he read the paper.
“Every self-respecting climate scientist that I knew that read it agreed, this was appalling,’’ Mann said. “It wasn’t legitimate. It was simply a politically motivated attack on a body of work masquerading as science.’’