Identification of the bird in the videotape as an ivory-billed woodpecker "rests on mistaken interpretations of the bird's posture," according to a research team headed by David A. Sibley of Concord, Mass.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
My Blog List
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Reconstructing the Esper Reconstruction5 months ago
-
Energy output dented by wind drought5 months ago
-
ビタミンと勃起の関係9 months ago
-
What I’ve Been Up To10 months ago
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
2 comments:
The NYT article is better. Fitz finally admits that the video is not difinitive!
We have made progress.
but he doesn't admit that they have presented a totally bogus interpretation of the video as "proof" he says that well by definition if anyone can't see what he sees then to them the video is "inconclusive" but Fitz hasn't said that TO him the video is inconclusive ... somehow I just have to believe that he knows the video isn't conclusive but he is in too deep to turn back now.
surprised that he isn't showing up at the explorer's club.
Post a Comment