Hardcopies of the October Auk are now available. This issue contains another round of rebuttals relating to Jerome Jackson's Auk commentary earlier this year.
In this issue, Jackson's rebuttal is about four pages in length, while Fitz et al's rebuttal is a couple of paragraphs long.
Here's one paragraph from Jackson:
In their rebuttal to Jackson (2006a), Fitzpatrick et al. (2006a) dwelt on semantics rather than implications, used quotations out of context, exaggerated the significance of their data, and used untruths and half truths as weapons of mass deception seemingly targeted at a public audience. I will not dissect details of their rebuttal except to demonstrate examples of their approach.
Jackson's original Auk commentary is available
here. Fitz et al's original rebuttal is
here.