In summary, therefore, Pascal’s wager can be applied neither to climate change nor to ‘global warming’ in any meaningful way. Indeed, believing in ‘global warming’ may burden you with more costs than not doing so, and believing that you know how to respond to ‘global warming’ may prove false, even if ‘global warming’ were to exist. Ultimately, of course, ‘global warming’ itself may prove a false ‘God’.
I wager it will. And, I’ll bet you all one thing: climate will change. Any takers?
Santa’s Green Energy Crisis
2 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment