'Forget climate change, we should spend on nutrition' - Times Online
Efforts to control global warming by cutting greenhouse gas emissions, however, were rated at the bottom of the league table, as the economists considered the high costs of such action were not justified by the payoffs.
Posts
1 comment:
Spending on nutrition would save people's lives. That isn't the environmentalist goal. The goal is to reduce the impact man has on the earth. This means fewer people.
Post a Comment