Below the title, it says:
The Sun, not a harmless, essential trace gas, drives climate change
CO2 is NOT the climate control knob
The Sun, not a harmless, essential trace gas, drives climate change
On Friday, former Vice President Al Gore closed RSA 2008 with a keynote speech on emerging green technologies. The talk, running 45 minutes in length, was an update of the presentation he used in the Academy Award-winning documentary "An Inconvenient Truth." The 2007 Nobel Laureate says global warming is real, and it may be worse than we previously thought. Three times during the speech, Gore was interrupted by hecklers. Each protester was removed by security.See also the post and comments here.
After talking for about 20 minutes, the first of three hecklers stood. A young woman started challenging Gore to admit he wanted to depopulate the Earth. She stood, taunting for about a minute before several security guards arrived to escort her out. As she was removed, a young man and a young woman toward the back stood up and began singing loudly. They, too, were removed. Then, after several minutes of silence from the audience, a middle-aged man stood up and started yelling that Gore was lying to the audience. He got the boot, as well.Update 2: Check out this claim by Gore:
Meanwhile, Gore reiterated that the Arctic floating ice cap is melting at a pace rapid enough that some scientists have estimated it to disappear entirely in the next five years, while adding, "It's been there for three million."Update 3: Don't miss the entire thing here.
After 15 minutes into the meat of his speech, Gore exclaimed that "the Arctic ice cap will be completely melted within 5 years". You could hear some gasps in the crowd. Not sure what others thought, but I thought it was without merit. So now it gets good. About a minute later, a brave young woman in her early twenties near the front row begins to tell Gore that he is wrong. He trys to laugh it off. She stays standing and continues to yell at him. Before her interruption many people began to leave early. I think the 5 year melting of the arctic was too much. So, she continues. The guards close in on her. I decided to follow her out. I could not take it anymore. I wanted to say something to her. I make it to the door right behind her. She is being escorted by three guards. I managed to get close to her and thanked her. She smiled and said your welcome. A cop meets them outside and continues with them up the escalator. I follow behind on the escalator. I hear really loud singing. A group of 10 or more come out of the keynote room singing a funny song. It was something like "Al Gore NotCo2, blah blah blah" The NotCo2 part sounded like Nazi. They followed close behind me on the escalator. There seemed to be more commotion and I witnessed many more people leaving early after I had exited. When we reached the top of the escalator, the cops and guards escorted the woman away. I did not catch where they went. The singers made to the top and then disappeared in an unknown direction. There was quite a bit of confusion going on. My thought is that the speech was cut short by so many leaving and the few causing the disruption. He got what he deserved.
It is simply unacceptable if Montanans will pay significantly more for electricity and gasoline, and possibly even lose their jobs, for legislation that has minimal worldwide impact on reducing greenhouse gases.


We received an email asking why we didn't believe the UN IPCC models predicting world climate meltdown in a few years were good models. We sent back a list of items the UN Climate Yo-Yos deliberately omit from their models.
And the sketch [below], just in case he still didn't get it.
Trevisan explains her decision to leave CSS: "I decided to move forward and dedicate more of my time to fashion and other projects. Just a big change of priorities, as I will never stop playing music."
"I am also a bit worried about climate change. People should care more and do something about it. I decided to fly less."
Conservative Opposition Leader Hugh McFadyen said the plan lacks teeth.
"I was surprised that after all the NDP's bravado on climate change they would announce something that would be such a dud in terms of both targets and the means they propose to get to those targets," he said, pointing out that 95 per cent of the reductions won't be achieved until after the next provincial election.
"No enforcement mechanisms, no incentives to help move any of the companies or others to that may be emitting CO{-2} toward the target. ... In the immortal words of Marge Simpson, 'Aim low, kids. Aim so low that nobody will know when you succeed.' "
The following comes directly from the Campaign against Climate Change UK activists portal. Comments are unedited, sequential and complete as at 05:50 GMT Saturday, April 12, 2008. it must’ve come as quite a shock to Jo Abbess that even her fellow enviros are appalled by her actions.
Even more troubling is that the BBC folded to pressure from what increasingly appears one lone and unsupported fruitcake who offered not a single instance of factual error in the original article. As yet we know of no one who has received a reply from the BBC requesting further information on the alleged request for change from the WMO. Developing…
Battin stated, “I don’t want to say I feel cheated by the promise of saving the planet, but OK I feel cheated. I purchased this credit to do something about climate change.” With the Committee’s lackluster response, and recent press coverage pointing towards a looming global cooling crisis, Battin believes the “global warming” alarm is likely overheated.
Are you willing to pay 12 to 30 cents more a month on your utility bill for an institute coordinating energy and climate change technology research across the state?Update: Another related post is here.
Actually, you don't have a choice. The California Public Utilities Commission on Thursday unanimously approved the $600 million California Institute for Climate Solutions, which will be paid for by money from ratepayers' monthly electric bills, to the tune of $60 million a year.
The institute aims to speed up research into cutting greenhouse gas emissions, such as auto exhaust, that contribute to pollution. This work is already under way at laboratories as well as universities such as University of California, Berkeley, and Stanford. The idea is that the institute will help the various entities work together.
Here.
Excerpt:
Bast said, "it is my hope, and the reason The Heartland Institute organized this conference, that public policies that impose enormous costs on millions of people, in the United States and also around the world, will not be passed into law before the fake 'consensus' on global warming collapses.
"Once passed, taxes and regulations are often hard to repeal," said Bast. "Once lost, freedoms are often very difficult to retrieve."
One of the most influential scientists behind the theory that global warming has intensified recent hurricane activity says he will reconsider his stand.A related post is here.The hurricane expert, Kerry Emanuel of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, this week unveiled a novel technique for predicting hurricane activity. The new work suggests that, even in a dramatically warming world, hurricane frequency and intensity may not substantially rise during the next two centuries.
The research, appearing in the March issue of Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, is all the more remarkable coming from Emanuel, a highly visible leader in his field and long an ardent proponent of a link between global warming and much stronger hurricanes.
His changing views could influence other scientists.
April 3, 2008: Interview with NRSP Chairman Dr. Tim Ball on The Richard Syrett Show, CFRB radio, Toronto, Ontario. Dr. Ball and Richard Syrett discuss the science and politics of climate change.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will not stop preparing its regular global reports, the next one is due in 2014, chairman of IPCC Rajendra Pachauri said on Thursday, at the closing of a four-day session held in Budapest.
Diana Urge-Vorsatz, one of the over 2,000 scientists who authored the latest report in 2007, said there have been doubts about the future of the regular reports as scientists wondered where research on the subject was headed.
Pachauri said the next report will aim to look for regional rather than global scenarios and possible solutions, and highlight the economic and social aspects of climate change.
At its Budapest session, IPCC adopted a special report on climate change and water management, pointing to the urgent need to adapt to heavier rains, flooding and drought.
In Hawaii, Connecticut and California, lawmakers passed legally binding emissions reductions without suggesting how those reductions would take place. The governors of New Jersey, Florida and Colorado committed their states to non-binding emissions targets, but kept silent on their strategy for achieving these cuts. For all the talk, no one has yet to put forth a viable plan to reduce emissions.
Thirty-one percent (31%) consider Al Gore an expert on Global Warming. That figure includes 48% of Democrats,12% of Republicans, and 27% of those not affiliated with either major party.Note that 47% believe human activity is primarily to blame for Global Warming, down from 50% in July '07.
Only 34% believe it is possible to stop Global Warming.
The Bootcamps have already run across the U.S. and one was recently held in India where over 1,000 people participated. Europe is next on the hit list as Gore continues to recruit what he fondly calls his cavalry. Even movie stars are on board, with Cameron Diaz part of the charge.This is odd:
A scientist on Gore's staff is present during the training to answer any technical questions posed by the volunteers...Why can't Gore answer these questions himself?
My cheeks are a bit frostbitten, and I have had it now for some days - white spots and swollen. I am hoping it will heel fast.
"The cool temperature here is really cruel, about -40 °C [-40 °F, a fixed point haha], and it was the worst problem on our journey (together with the bears). I couldn't even imagine it was that cold. Thanks God that at least the wind has stopped. Now I am dreaming about a warm bathtub."
The emerging MPCA policy is turning heads for several reasons.Note the obligatory visual of smokestacks belching something other than carbon dioxide.
First, there is no state policy that requires any agency to actually put carbon-reduction policies in place. Moore is moving on his own.
Second, the Pawlenty administration has been conspicuously timid in embracing recommendations of its own Climate Change Advisory Group. Earlier this year, a joint "preliminary" position announced by the Department of Commerce, either ignored or took an arms-length approach to carbon-reduction actions to meet stringent goals of the Next General Energy Act.
One should not mix up a scenario with a forecast - I cannot easily compare a scenario for the effects of greenhouse gases alone with observed data, because I cannot easily isolate the effect of the greenhouse gases in these data, given that other forcings are also at play in the real world.
Why is a station that is classified as rural, with an apparent cooling bias due to tree cover, with a long history containing only a few moves, in a small agricultural town with little growth in the last century get an adjustment like this that causes the past to get colder, and create an artificially enhanced positive slope of temperature trend?
The 56-member Minnesota Climate Change Advisory Group, appointed last spring by Gov. Tim Pawlenty, worked much of the year to develop strategies for the state to meet a legislatively prescribed goal of cutting emissions by progressively deeper levels over the next four decades.
Its final report, which is being released for public comment, recommends a wide array of approaches, from working with other states to develop a market-based system for cutting utility emissions to reducing vehicle miles traveled. Some require administrative changes while others require legislative action.
If the state adopts them, Rep. Michael Beard, R-Shakopee, questioned "what we are getting for the effort we are expending?''
"Show us the benefits, show us the cost, help us make a good decision,'' Sen. David Hann, R-Eden Prairie, added.
“Voters are much more skeptical about the science than we had previously assumed, so it naturally follows that most are also unwilling to accept the costs and job losses associated with cap-and-trade legislation,” said Thomas Pyle, president of the institute. “In short, the matter is far from settled in the eyes of the public.”
“In three years we’ll at least know the direction we are headed,” Easterbrook said. “If we are one degree warmer in 2010 than we were in 2005, I will appear here and eat my words.”
Is all of this bad? If you’re one of many climate scientists foreseeing calamity, yes. If you’re a village kid in rural India looking for a light to read by, no.
Even during the increased media attention to global warming that accompanied the release of An Inconvenient Truth, the percentage of people who ranked global warming as an important issue fell. If the environmental movement had 15 minutes of fame, that was it — what makes Gore think that this ad campaign is going to succeed where his feature film failed?
Three committees have descended into anarchy:
-Environment committee, where Tory MPs are filibustering a NDP climate change bill that is supported by the other two opposition parties.
...
R. K. Pachauri (via email):
Thank you for your email of 3 April 2008.
It was just a couple of days ago in London that I was speaking to a highly respected journalist, and he asked why the skeptics had become suddenly quiet. I responded by saying that in my view it is only the lull before the storm because they must be organizing themselves to strike at the IPCC. Indeed, this is precisely what has happened. All of us, of course, have to keep our cool and stick to truth and scientific facts in dealing with the agents of some vested interests who want no action on climate change.
RESPECTED academic Don Aitkin has seen the ugly side of the climate change debate after being warned he faced demonisation if he challenged the accepted wisdom that global warming poses a danger to humanity.
Professor Aitkin told The Australian yesterday he had been told he was "out of his mind" by some in the media after writing that the science of global warming "doesn't seem to stack up".
"We are moving forward, but not as quickly as we'd like. But we are determined to get it right," he said of his committee's efforts. One question is whether a carbon cap-and-trade program would use State Implementation Plans, New Source Review, or an entirely new approach, Dingell said.
"We're looking at carbon capture and storage, new technologies, and other components to continue using coal in an environmentally proper way, since the United States is, in fact, the 'Saudi Arabia of coal.' Any plan also must include judicious use of our domestic natural gas resources. It is my hope that we can adopt legislation to address all these problems before the end of this year," he said.
The climate is not highly sensitive to CO2 warming because water vapour is a damper against the warming effect of CO2.
That is why history is full of Ice Ages - where other effects, such as increased reflection from the ice cover, do provide positive feedback - while we do not hear about Heat Ages. The Medieval Warm Period, for example, is known for being benignly warm - not dangerously hot.
We live on a benign planet - except when it occasionally gets damned cold.
LEGAZPI, 8 April 2008 (IRIN) - "Ask the old people here in Albay province and they will tell you, they've never experienced this magnitude of storms and typhoons before," Nong Rongasa, executive director of the Centre for Initiatives and Research on Climate Adaptation of Albay province, told IRIN. "Every week there is a climate change-related event - high tides and heavy rains."If so, what caused the bad stuff mentioned here?
As further evidence, Rongasa cited a combination of heavy rains, high tides and sea surge that recently flooded Lagazpi City, the provincial capital. "It's just never happened before," he said.
"I believe we have the capacity at moments of great challenge to set aside the causes of distraction and rise to the challenge that history is presenting to us," he said. "How may generations in all of human history have had the opportunity to rise to a challenge that is worthy of our best efforts; that has a challenge that can pull from us more than we knew we could do? I think we ought to approach this challenge with a sense of profound joy and gratitude that we are the generation about which, a thousand years from now, philharmonic orchestras and poets and singers will celebrate by saying they were the ones that found it within themselves to solve this crisis and lay the basis for our bright and optimistic future."
As far as the scientific community is concerned, the "debate" about whether global warming is occurring and to what extent it is caused by humans is over.
Phoning into the conference call from Iqaluit, Nunavut, the northernmost Canadian territory, arctic explorer Will Steger stressed that we have the answer to global warming. “One of the most promising solutions is really in the transportation sector — and that’s the development of ethanol,” Steger said. “Ethanol is really something we need right now.”
...
His particular penchant for ethanol, however, might be partially explained by the backers of his latest trek. The Renewable Fuels Foundation, Chippewa Valley Ethanol, investment bank Piper Jaffray, and ethanol plant builder Fagen are all expedition sponsors with considerable ethanol interests. And this marks the first time we’ve noticed ethanol companies sponsoring global warming research.
Steger admits that corn ethanol is an imperfect solution, but noted that the technology is constantly evolving, and said it’s something we can start implementing on a larger scale now.
"The ice has been a rather large impediment, you know, contrary to what it was in previous years. I mean, for the past two years we didn't have any ice," said DFO spokesman Luke Legere.
"It seems this year we've gone from one extreme to the other where there's too much ice. It's very hard-packed, very thick, so it's made things really difficult for the fishers to actually get to where the seal herds are."
Among the ideas with the greatest potential impact are:
...
• Using two-sided printing for all city documents.
[Richard] Watson, author of Future File: A History Of The Next 50 Years (Scribe), is a keynote speaker at Designex, the interior design industry's annual trade-only exhibition and seminar series, starting next Thursday. It's where manufacturers and big homewares brands launch their latest products.
This year's exhibition has an eco-conscious mood. Even Jamie Durie is weighing in as an Al Gore-nominated ambassador on global warming, delivering a seminar on climate change and what the design industry can do about it.
Watson, however, remains cynical about our personal commitment to reducing global warming.
"Green is this year's colour," he says. "If I see another carbon neutral cappuccino or beer where trees have been planted to offset emissions ..." He sighs. "I think there's a very strong fashion element to this. And there is quite a serious amount of eco-exhaustion building up.
"What I see is people pulling down houses to build new ones to the very boundaries and putting in enormous amounts of glass and installing massive air conditioners. The average Australian family is getting smaller but the average Australian dwelling is getting bigger and the size of the rooms is going up. At the same time if you look at the airlines only 1 per cent of clients pay for the carbon emissions' offset option [on their airline ticket]."
"I feel very lucky," Pringle said. "I've haven't been doing this long -- only 41 years -- but I don't think I've seen a March that has been this cold, this long."
Pringle and Olmstead have been fighting off the freezing night temperatures with water, which when it freezes releases heat, which rises and protects the trees. Wind machines, used in conjunction with the water, pull the rising warm air back through the orchards.
Other growers are using orchard heaters filled with propane or farm diesel, said Jim Kelley, a Pasco grower and consultant. "That's pretty expensive," he said.
With propane at nearly $2 a gallon, it can cost up to $800 a night to heat an acre.
But growers are doing anything they can to save every bud, he added.
Well, this is how the media and not only media work these days. If the article doesn't obey the requirements of far-left movements from the very beginning and if the journalist resists the first batch of aggressive e-mails, he will usually surrender to the second batch. Many journalists are either biased activists or cowards. And some of them are both.
Comment from Jim PedenOn a related note, check out this sentence from the presenters' Climate Statement:
Al Gore now combines Amway and Evangelism to produce a series of "training sessions" which in turn will produce an army of "climate change fighters". His new Climate Project is non-profit volunteer group that focuses on his now totally-discredited movie, An Inconvenient Truth and his follow-up presentations. Gore will lead the participants through the junk science and format of his presentation, so they can repeat it in their communities.
His reported advertising budget? $300,000,000.00.
Each participant makes a commitment to give the presentation at least 10 times. No mention of a pink Cadillac as a prize for the most converts.
We are 275 volunteers, of diverse backgrounds and ages, and representing all Canadian provinces and territories, who have been trained by Nobel Laureate the Honourable Al Gore to deliver his Academy Award-winning climate change presentation – to raise awareness and to inspire action on this planetary emergency.If there's one thing we've all evidently learned, it's that those Oscar voters are absolute sticklers on scientific truth in movies.
Speaking to The Guardian, Hansen said that CO2 levels should be slashed to 350ppm – a level below the current stock of greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere – if "humanity wishes to preserve a planet similar to that on which civilisation developed".Given that sea levels have risen maybe 8 inches in the last century, it's nothing short of madness to suggest that a bump in CO2 will raise sea levels nearly 3,000 inches.
"If you leave us at 450ppm for long enough it will probably melt all the ice – that's a sea rise of 75 metres," he added. "What we have found is that the target we have all been aiming for is a disaster – a guaranteed disaster."
When the history of the climate crisis is written, Hansen will be seen as the scientist with the most powerful and consistent voice calling for intelligent action to preserve our planet's environment.Hansen is not just any old crackpot scientist--he's THE crackpot scientist at the very epicenter of carbon dioxide hysteria.
Hansen posits that the long term trend in the deep ocean temperature in the early Cenozoic period (before there was substantial ice) was purely due to CO2 (using the Charney sensitivity). He then plays around with the value of the CO2 concentration at the initiation of the Antarctic ice sheets (around 34 million years ago) to get the best fit with the CO2 reconstructions over the whole period. What he ends up with is a critical value of ~425 ppm for initiation of glaciation. To be sure, this is fraught with uncertainties - in the temperature records, the CO2 reconstructions and the reasonable (but unproven) assumption concerning the dominance of CO2. However, bottom line is that you really don't need a big change in CO2 to end up with a big change in ice sheet extent, and that hence the Earth System sensitivity is high.
So, Gore flaunts his prowess as a savvy investor-entrepreneur by appearing in glossy business magazines, but when someone points out the obvious, that his business interests and environmentalist crusade overlap, he gets indignant?
According to an Ipsos MORI opinion poll last summer, 56 per cent of people mistakenly tended to agree or strongly agree with the statement that "many leading experts still question if human activity is contributing to climate change".See also the related post here.
Just after Sigrid finished her dispatch last night our campsite was again visited by polar bears. This time it was two bears. One huge mamma bear and her two year old cub. Unlike our curious visitor earlier in the evening these bears were not easy to scare off and they got very close to our dogs and tents - we measurered the distance at about 6 meters. It took about 5 bear bangers and flares to scare the bears off and we were all pretty scared when they got as close as they did. Luckily for us the bears are well fed this time of year as they feed on the newly born seal pups and the adult seals that are nesting under the snow on top of the ice.
Today when we continued our journey we saw over 20 different bear tracks and it became clear to us that we now are in an area that is a great habitat for the bears.
Gore also spoke about the inevitable quibbles that presenters will have to keep in mind, “attacks on reason by sceptics who are getting paid money from large carbon polluters.”I wonder how many of these 35 "errors" remain in Gore's slide show?