Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Challenging Alarmism: John Maddox (1925–2009), RIP — MasterResource
There seems to be a negative, not positive, correlation between the accuracy of prediction on the one hand and respect and power on the other. But this is an anomoly that will be corrected as good science drives out bad and the wider public wakes up to excesses of the current orthodoxy in (political) science. Let’s hope it is sooner rather than later.
WEBCommentary(tm) - EPA Relies on Peddlers of the Climate Alarmist Global Warming Scam
If the EPA really believes it's claim that greenhouse gases are "pollutants", then why is the EPA proposing to regulate virtually every atmospheric greenhouse gas except water vapor, responsible for nearly all greenhouse gas warming?
Pajamas Media » The Obama Administration: That 70s Show
On energy, regulatory schemes to increase energy prices and thereby decrease energy usage are now in fashion. We aren’t yet rationing gas by the last digit of car license plates, but cap-and-trade legislation and the pronouncement that carbon dioxide is a threat to the planet have a common goal: restrict carbon output and industrial activity.
California Tax Revolt 2009 - Obama Climate Change Parody
People are getting more and more skeptical about the whole Global Warming hysteria. In fact, the word global warming is being disowned by the radical environmentalists in favor of "climate change" because some areas are actually experiencing cooler weather. They figure that Climate Change covers their bases whether the temperature goes up or down. No human being can claim to know what exactly is going on or more specifically, why it is happening. The debate on global warming is not over Mr. Gore. There are intelligent scientists on both sides, though government funding favors those in support of man-man global warming. In other words, there is no money in it if you don't believe man is the cause. These scientists generally can agree on what is happening, but not why it is taking place. Is it man-made or just the natural cycle of the earth?

No comments: