Monday, May 11, 2009

Alarmist Jeff Schweitzer actually thinks the science is on his side: Climate Change and Christian Values
Democrats need to push climate change legislation by making the most cogent, fact-based, scientifically-sound arguments possible given the evidence in hand. Any deviation from that course is irresponsible. If those who wish to pursue faith-based science are left behind, then so be it. If on the other hand we fail as a country and as a species to address a changing climate, then we deserve the consequences. Let the market of ideas choose the winners.
About Jeff Schweitzer
Dr. Schweitzer served at the White House during the Clinton Administration as Assistant Director for International Affairs in the Office of Science and Technology Policy. Dr. Schweitzer was responsible for providing scientific and technological policy advice and analysis for Al Gore, President Clinton and President Clinton's Science Advisor, and to coordinate the U.S. government's international science and technology cooperation.
Twitter / edaugusts
Global warming? Melting icecaps? Maybe, but the sandy beaches all along Santa Cruz, CA., are just as wide now as they were 50 years ago.
Buzzwords: Rephrasing Obama's lexicon - Los Angeles Times
Scratch 'cap and trade' and 'global warming,' some Democratic pollsters tell Obama. They're ineffective. Republicans are also rethinking how to use words to their advantage.

Reporting from Washington -- In the debate over his top environmental goals, President Obama is backing away from "cap and trade."

Not the policy. It's the phrase itself, deemed confusing by Democratic pollsters, that has all but disappeared from the president's vocabulary of late.
...
"Global warming" is a phrase that also may be in jeopardy. Some Democratic pollsters dislike it; others think that jettisoning a term that has been the subject of a vigorous branding campaign would be risky.

No comments: