Dump Michele Bachmann blog suggests that it's insane to oppose the greatest scientific fraud in history

1) We have an on-going discussion here of why she's suddenly scheduling public events about issues that concern more voters than the ones in her base. This year, she began doing photo-op events about women's health, social security, etc. in addition to the usual kind of stuff she does-- events about "lower my taxes," "our teachers are propagandists" and there is "no man made climate change." I say she's doing that to expand her voting base; others here say she's doing that to "stop loss" of, for example, her women voters.

Either way, the photo-ops about "sane" issues create future pictures for campaigns for governor or senate. Anybody who's paying attention regularly knows that she doesn't give a damn or a dime about the "sane" issues. But these "sane issue events" indicate she's trying to reach out beyond the conservatives who love her--to grab some of the people who aren't paying much attention. Conclusion: it's necessary for her to do that if she wants to run for gov, and--it may work.

News flash: Negus asks alarmist hard question | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

SBS host George Negus belatedly remembers he’s a journalist who should now and then ask climate catastrophists a tough question. Sure, he didn’t ask Nobel Prize alarmist Wangari Maathai why, when our emissions are rising, temperatures now are actually falling, but what he did finally ask was enough to tell us she actually hasn’t a clue about about the science: