American Thinker: India and Global Warming

There is, in fact, only one logical conclusion about the emphatic rejection by the government of India of the carbon emission caps which Secretary of State Clinton asked India to accept: thoughtful, concerned, scientists and administrators who would be most directly harmed by the dangers of man-made global warming do not accept the premises of its advocates. Perhaps the Indians do not believe the planet is warming or perhaps they do not believe that warming is the result of man-made activities or perhaps they believe that any warming holds slight danger for even a land directly in the cross-hairs of any harm that global warming might hold.

Nabobs like Al Gore or Hillary Clinton, rich and powerful, living in America, will be fine whatever happens to our climate. If the worst fears of the global warming priests turns out to be correct, Gore and Clinton will still live comfortable, safe, lives. When those most vulnerable, like the people of India, reject the arguments of global warming, that ought to mean a lot to anyone who cares about the truth.

Letters: Global warming backers pursue personal agenda | Postcrescent.com | Appleton Post-Crescent

It is my opinion that many, if not all, of the global warming proponents are using this issue to pursue a personal agenda. If exposed, they will mutter something about the issue being too important, for their reason, to let the facts get in their way.

I say, "Shame."

John E. Bittman

Gavin Schmidt on solar trends and global warming « Watts Up With That?

I really wish Gavin would put as much effort into getting the oddities with the GISTEMP dataset fixed rather than writing coffee table books and trying new models to show the sun has little impact.

This paper gets extra points for using the word “robust”. – Anthony

Rio challenges Rudd’s “green power” myth | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

Rio Tinto wants an end to the lies about the new green power on which we’re supposed to soon rely