Video - Climate Change Legislation Draws Criticism - WSJ.com

As Congress writes the details of climate legislation, members of one of the most influential coalitions in the debate is splintering over the fine print. WSJ's Stephen Power explains.

Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group News » Transcript of My Talk “Considering the Human Influence on Climate” At The George C. Marshall Institute

The Transcript of my presentation “Considering the Human Influence on Climate” by Dr. Roger A. Pielke, Sr. May 14, 2009 is now available, courtesy of the George C. Marshall Institute.

Michelle Malkin » Study in contrasts: Christian scientist vs. eco-mad scientist

My syndicated column below contrasts the Left’s “unease” over the evangelical Christian faith of NIH director-designate Francis Collins with its radio silence on the eco-zealotry of Obama science czar John Holdren. But first, some late-breaking developments: As Zombie notes, the White House has responded to rising blogosphere unease with Holdren’s cultish ideas by pooh-poohing Holdren’s co-authorship of the nutball manifesto, Ecoscience. Team Obama told the Washington Times that Holdren “never has been an advocate for policies of forced sterilization.” Never? Whom do you believe: the White House or your own eyes?

C3: RealClimate.org Admits Being Wrong About Global Warming Since 1998; They Apologize To Skeptics!; They Predict After 2020 They Will Be Right

Read here, here and here (comments at first two links are interesting). Okay, okay, two out of three are right in the post's headline! That's a better record than any climate model.

Since RealClimate alarmists and scientists now appear to concede that global warming has not really happened since 1998, and that the climate models' predictions that they have touted were soooo wrong, is it time for them to apologize to skeptics? Well....that ain't about to happen before 2020, but the alarmists could join with many skeptics on a few issues to make some amends in the meantime. What might those issues be?