What Does & Does Not Cause Climate Change and the threat to integrity in science by Piers Corbyn | Climate Realists

The point I made that the CO2 driver theory of Climate Change is refuted by the evidence and will be cast aside by solar-based science and therefore it would be better for Imperial to lead its demise and advances in new science rather than lose credibility by defending the indefensible, stands more strongly than ever.

The CO2-centered Climate theory and all that stands with it in business and politics is doomed; or if it is not doomed then the integrity of science itself is surely doomed. It is incumbent on scientists of with moral fibre to defend evidence-based science and the integrity of science.

Continued cool weather in Minnesota: What would this mean for Nate Silver's climate bet?

The metro as of yesterday was running around 1.5 degrees below normal since June 1st but indications are we could tag on a few more degrees in the wrong direction over the next couple of weeks.

The jetstream this time of year takes a hiatus into central Canada but this year it is overstaying its welcome. This is keeping us in a cooler than average pattern and that doesn't seem to be changing as a whole for at least the next few weeks. Fans of heat and humidity will not be very satisfied.

Question: Why would we want to spend $45 trillion and revert to Civil War-era lifestyles in an effort to nudge global temperatures in the "wrong" direction?