Twitter / Will Heaven: What climate rationalists ...
What climate rationalists are up against (see comments) http://bit.ly/5HYr6tTwitter / Adam Connell:
@WillHeaven Your blog on climate change is like a piece of meat being thrown to hundreds of starved lions. Good luck!Twitter / Will Heaven:
@forwardadam Tens of thousands, more like. They're all bonkers though so i'm having a lot of fun!Comment On The Inaccurate Response By Gavin Schmidt Of Real Climate On The Role of Land Use Change On Temperature Trends « Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr.
Since Gavin Schmidt is not a recognized expert on the role of land use/land cover change, he should have sought a qualified climate scientist to address the comment by CCPO. Instead, he perpetuates the biased and often inaccurate presentation of climate views on Real Climate.CRU Data-Cooking: Recipe Exposed! « JoNova
Ladies and gentlemen, I’m seriously concerned. All along I’ve said the world was warming. Now I’m not so sure. How would we know? How does anyone know in the light of all that data fudging?
That hacker or leaker of info deserves glory and thanks.
Serious postscript: How can anyone defend this? These people work for a team that wants more of your money. Is this not evidence of criminal intent to deceive?
Posts
1 comment:
It looks like the media spin will be variations on "sure Phil Jones was a bad boy, but global warming science is still sound".
Lets show em how hollow that rings.
Here is the CRU time series referenced as Brohan, P., J.J. Kennedy, I. Harris, S.F.B. Tett and P.D. Jones, 2006: Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: a new dataset from 1850. J. Geophysical Research 111, D12106,
Here are the first ten out of 312 cited papers that rest on Phil Jones data, Google scholar papers citing Brohan, P., J.J. Kennedy, I. Harris, S.F.B. Tett and P.D. Jones, 2006: Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: a new dataset from 1850. J. Geophysical Research 111, D12106,
The first in that list (http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/trends/temp/jonescru/jones.html) is in turn cited by 154 other scientific papers.
The first paper that cites the CDIAC (Dynamics of marine ecosystems: biological-physical interactions in the oceans
KH Mann, JRN Lazier, 2006 - books.google.com) is cited 476 times.
In turn the first citation of Dynamics of Marine ecosystems
(Primary production by phytoplankton and microphytobenthos in estuaries
GJC Underwood, J Kromkamp - Estuaries, 1999 - books.google.com)
is cited by 175 scientific papers.
So on and so on and so on.
How many thousands of scientific studies are predicated on the original P Jones et al 2006: Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: a new dataset from 1850. J. Geophysical Research 111, ...
Who knows?
They all are thrown into question.
So much for climate change science.
Post a Comment