Shaken « the Air Vent

I am truly shaken, there’s no other word for it. I’ve been pushed too far by this and am nearly to the point of denying the whole thing- I’m science minded and have no proof but the intentional manipulation, the fraud .. and it was fraud (we don’t use the f-bomb here) the browbeating of senior scientists in less powerful positions. The IPCC is corrupted and thoroughly implicated. It’s ugly and it is REAL!!

Instapundit » Blog Archive

PJTV WILL HAVE CREWS IN COPENHAGEN covering the “climate change” conference.

Journal Editorial Report Gets It! « Musings from the Chiefio

Today, they had a very nice segment on AGW and Climategate. They actually mentioned both the email issues (including the subornation of the peer review process) AND the code issues (including the ‘fudge factor’ usage and cooking the books to achieve a goal).

Bravo Journal Editorial Report and Paul Gigot!

An Inconvenient Lie Exposed | Christianpost.com

The inconvenient lie of climate change has been brought out of the shadows of scientific doublespeak and into the light of revealing emails that prove manipulation of the facts. The leaked emails from climate change giants such as Phil Jones, the current Director of the CRU, Tom Wigley, Michael Mann, Hubert Lamb, and a host of others reveal three shocking strands of a tightly woven web of deception.

How Climategate Ranks in a Media Interest Index « Roy Spencer, Ph. D.

The lack of coverage of Climategate by the mainstream news media over the last 2 weeks has been breathtaking.

Climategate reveals 'the most influential tree in the world' - Telegraph

I will only add two footnotes to this real-life new version of the old story. One is that, as we can see from the CRU's website, the largest single source of funding for all its projects has been the European Union, which at Copenhagen will be more insistent than anyone that the world should sign up to what amounts to the most costly economic suicide note in history.

SEPP EDITORIAL: By Kenneth Haapala. Brought to you by SEPP (www.SEPP.org) | Climate Realists

Thus according to the IPCC, compelling physical evidence of extensive warming in one part of the globe is counterbalanced by computer simulations of cooling in another part of the globe for which physical evidence is lacking. The life work of Lamb in compiling physical evidence has been trumped by computer simulations with little or no supporting physical evidence.