[Another snicker-worthy claim: Recent warming has been even higher than the fudged thermometer data would indicate]

New analyses provide preliminary evidence that temperature data from the UK Met office may under-estimate recent warming. That’s the conclusion of a talk given here today by Chris Folland of the Met Office Hadley Centre. Folland says that there is a very good chance that there has been more warming over land and over the ocean in the past decade than suggested by conventional data sets, but he says that the issues with land and ocean data are entirely unrelated.

Deutsche Bank: Climate Change [Swindle] Is an Investor's Dream — If the Government Mandates It | BNET Energy Blog | BNET

Their message: Invest in climate change. With one caveat: Government mandates and policies rather than carbon markets will be the key catalysts to growth in the climate change sector. Which is the exact opposite message coming from many high-carbon emitting companies.

The new skeptic’s desultory conversation (with apologies to Paul Simon) | GlobalWarming.org

A pithy column in Foreign Policy by the Breakthrough Institute’s Ted Nordhaus and Michael Schellenberger says that ”twice-fooled” Democrats, who have been “BTUed” by two Democratic administrations, “are unlikely to sign up for more of the same in the next Congress” (cap-and-trade being the regulatory form of a BTU tax on carbon-based energy).

EU Referendum: "We got it wrong"

Note from the story that the admission of error was made by IPCC vice chairman Dr Jean-Pascal van Ypersel – not Dr R K Pachauri.

As of yesterday, the former railway engineer was still in denial saying, "... even if there was an error, and I'm not saying there was ... ". He adds: "this is a very small issue".

One small issue for [a] man, one giant error for mankind?