Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Roger Pielke Jr.'s Blog: What Does Pielke Think About This?
So not only did the IPCC AR4 WGII egregiously misrepresent the science of disasters and climate change, but when questions were raised about that section by at least one expert reviewer, it simply made up a misleading and false response about my views. Not good.
Abbott's stinging attack on Rudd | Australian Climate Madness
"It was typical Rudd," Mr Abbott said. "It was full of things that we have to do in 2050, and almost nothing about what he would do this year."
‘CAP-AND-TRADE IS DEAD’–IS A FEDERAL RENEWABLE MANDATE NEXT TO WHITHER? (A ‘tea party’ seems to be brewing against industrial windpower too) — MasterResource
Temperature trends, Climategate, Copenhagen, IPCC falsification, and now the Massachusetts Revolution–cap-and-trade is dead, the political pundits say. So much for the inevitability argument that I heard from my colleagues during the Enron years (”come on Rob, get out in front of it and shape it!”) and the science-is-settled I heard after.
#5) PART II – CASTING, CASTING, CASTING: How to deal with public “debates” | Alarmist Filmmaker Randy Olson
Just watch any television news show “debate” involving Marc Morano (former spokesperson for Senator James Inhofe, now the loudest and most aggressive mouth for the climate skeptics with his Climate Depot website). He’s had several. I don’t want to name his opponents, but they have ALL been chewed up and spat out by him. ALL of them.

No comments: