BBC under Investigation for Misinforming on Climate, Vaccines...

The body which oversees the BBC is to launch a full-scale review into whether its coverage of science and the environment is biased (following Corporations' agenda).

The BBC Trust acted after thousands of complaints that the corporation is acting as a #1 cheerleader for the theory that climate change is a man-made phenomenon.

Desertification may have retarded global warming | Science and Environment | Jerusalem Post

The desert reflects sunlight and releases infrared radiation, which has a cooling effect.

Are the folks at NOAA and NASA global warming co-conspirators? (Wizbang)

You'd think this would be getting wider play. You'd think that there'd be honest media outlets who would indeed stop the presses... or at least publish something other than the standard fare we've been getting.

George F. Will - For Obama, a mandate to be moderate - washingtonpost.com

For example, surely only Democrats tugged by the romance of political suicide will want him to try -- he will fail -- to burden the struggling economy with cap-and-trade legislation.

This complex and costly carbon-rationing plan supposedly would combat the elusive menace of global warming. Serendipitously, on Tuesday, as Massachusetts voters were telling Obama to pause regarding health-care reform, the Wall Street Journal was reporting: "An influential United Nations panel is facing growing criticism about its practices after acknowledging doubts about a 2007 statement that Himalayan glaciers were retreating faster than those anywhere else and would entirely disappear by 2035, if not sooner."

The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change -- co-winner with Al Gore of another absurd Nobel Peace Prize -- issued the questionable 2007 report, which was based on a 2005 report from an environmental advocacy group that relied on a 1999 article quoting an Indian scientist who actually did not mention 2035. Another day, another dollop of evidence of the seepage of dubious science into policy debate, and another reason to proceed cautiously.

‘Mann-Made’ Global Warming? - The Philadelphia Bulletin

The e-mails reveal that Mr. Mann might have committed a variety of acts that constitute significant and intentional scientific misconduct, including data manipulation, inappropriately shielding research methods and results from peers, and retaliating against those who publicly challenged his conclusions and political agenda.