Daily 49er - Scientific elite need to confront consequences

Continually brushing these incidents off as nothing and allowing the cheaters and liars to get away with some pretty hefty claims is unacceptable.

Just as Shirley & Company so aptly sang “Shame, shame, shame” in the mid 1970s, some more shaming is in order.

Shame on the IPCC for distributing a publication with false claims pertaining to global warming, an issue so pertinent in today’s world.

Double shame on the IPCC for expecting people to forgive the organization once its spokesman apologized.

And, finally, shame on the people, the publishers, the distributors, or anyone who accepts false information and provokes researchers to keep spewing out more B.S. It’s time to wake up and start paying attention.

American Thinker: Global Warming and the Science Fair Test

Hypothesis: If the Nobel Prize-winning IPCC scientists submitted their climate change research as a grade-school science fair project, it would fail miserably.
...
Judge this science project yourself. Were the variables well-controlled? Are the multiple hypotheses sufficiently supported? Were flaws in the experimental design intentionally suppressed? I give the IPCC scientists a resounding F-.

But why would formerly-respected scientists lie, cheat, and subvert science at the behest of the U.N. and various world governments? The power that controls carbon dioxide output will effectively control every living thing on Earth. Isn't that reason enough? Q.E.D., hypothesis proved.

Pennsylvania Governor Rendell [suggests that trace amounts of CO2 are "threatening life as we know it"]

"Energy independence means creating jobs at home that can't be outsourced. It means keeping the money we spend on gasoline here at home instead of putting it in the hands of oil cartels from foreign nations that are hostile to us, which in turn makes it about national security, too; and it means protecting our environment from pollutants that are warming our planet and threatening life as we know it."

Senate Democrats eye options on climate change [swindle]

Now Democratic leaders eager to cap the greenhouse gases blamed for global warming are mulling a possible plan B: tacking "clean energy" measures onto a job-creation package and following that up with an "energy-only" bill that doesn't contain a specific plan for combating climate change.