Geological Society of America declines endorsement by Geologist Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Emeritus Professor at Western Washington University | Climate Realists

"So we are being asked to believe that a change of 0.008% in the amount of a greenhouse gas (CO2) that accounts for only 3.6% of the greenhouse effect and which is incapable of changing the temperature of the atmosphere more than 0.1° is going to increase global temperatures by 10°F in the coming century!

Misconception About Environmental Degradation « Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr.

...These are just two examples of what has been successful improvements to the environment from what our parents and grandparents experienced. While we still, of course, can (and should) improve environmental quality further, statements such as “the crux here is that with each ensuing generation, the amount of environmental degradation increases, but each generation takes that amount as the norms, as the non-degraded condition” are false.

How the 7.30 Report nobbled Monckton | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

Summing up: the ABC finds it almost impossible to hold an honest debate on global warming. Warmists are allowed unchallenged air time, while sceptics are made examples of. Yet even then warmist scientists and activists cannot find an argument to save themselves from the few sceptics who finally get half a hard word in edgewise.

Your (ABC) news is being manipulated, but you can now see the fraud backstage though the gaping cracks.

RealClearPolitics - Manipulating the Climate Numbers

To my survey, there is not a single aspect of the "anthropogenic global warming" hypothesis that has been left standing by recent revelations, and more shoes drop every day.

Climategate Update 1: The China Syndrome* - Hit & Run : Reason Magazine

In any case, Phil Jones and the CRU crowd are in the process of finding out the truth of the old adage, "It's not the crime, it's the cover up" that eventually brings someone down.