Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Is the New York Times ignoring "Climategate"? | FP Passport
What the New York Times might want to dig into more deeply is: Just who are the folks behind all this Drudge bait? And just what are the track records of the journalists flogging this story? I bet the answer they find is that they are far, far worse than the IPCC's.
PoliGazette » Climate Gate is becoming a Serial
The best thing the citizens of the United States can do is demand that the Marky-Waxman cap and trade bill be killed. We should demand that the US refuse to sign on to anything like the Copenhagen protocols. We should demand a proper investigation of the funding of the scientists affiliated with IPCC, and demand to see the data, and allow other, genuinely impartial scientists to see it and evaluate it.

Meanwhile, new releases of the current thriller keep coming to a computer near you. Even some of the British press have discovered what’s going on. The American media are still ignoring the corruption and incompetence at IPCC. Will the Washington Post wake up in time? Will NBC report on Phil Jones, former CRU head, admitting that they were wrong about the Medieval Warming Period? Stay tuned for the next episode!
Only 35% now believe in global warming
According to a new Rasmussen poll, only the Democrat base (35%) now thinks climate change is man-made, rather than a naturally-occurring, cyclical phenomenon.
FTA carbon reduction scheme gets government thumbs-up
Lord Adonis, the Secretary of State for Transport, has backed a new scheme from the Freight Transport Association (FTA) to report the logistics sector’s carbon footprint publicly.
Reviews - Books - Global Warring by Cleo Paskal - The Ecologist
...as far as Global Warring goes, things will only become more critical as the waters start to rise!
Climate science finally catches a break: Donald Trump and his hair joins the anti-science side « Climate Progress
[In further attempts to discredit Trump, the follicly challenged Romm mentions Trump's hair no fewer than four more times in the body of this post.]

No comments: