Part seven: Victory for openness as IPCC climate [hoax] scientist opens up lab doors | Environment | guardian.co.uk

Ben Santer had a change of heart about data transparency despite being hectored and abused by rabid climate sceptics
...
Wearing his other hat as IPCC author, Santer was also widely accused of being the man who added the key words "discernible human influence" to the body of the IPCC report, and of doing it very late in the day. True enough. This was messy and does not reflect well on the IPCC. Those words were agreed at a main session of the IPCC in late 1995, attended by politicians. They wanted them included in the report's summary for policy-makers. But they went beyond what was said in the chapter from which the summary was supposedly drawn.