WORLDmag.com | Political climate science

The global warming scam has been pressed upon us with frantic alarm by everyone from Al Gore to the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia to virtually every teacher in the public school system. Life on the planet, we were told, is in mortal danger from climate change brought on by carbon emissions. The research was in, and there was a solid “consensus” in the scientific community...

Roger Helmer MEP

We are still concerned in this House about CO2 emissions, even as the theory of man-made climate change collapses before our eyes. If we really want to reduce CO2 emissions, then we need nuclear power stations. Yet we have constructed incentives that distort the market in favour of renewables and against nuclear power.

European economies need competitive, reliable, mainstream, base-load electricity generation. Nuclear can deliver that. But the pathetic, intermittent trickle of electricity from wind farms cannot be relied on to drive European industries

Terror as mall shark tank cracks-OT

Authorities later claimed the problem had been fixed, but were not allowing anyone near to see and anyone with photos of the drama were ordered by cops to delete them.

[Climate Fraud from NASA]: Climate Change: A Warming World

NASA scientists unveil their latest findings on our warming world: 2009 is tied as the second warmest year since modern recordkeeping began, and 2000-2009 is the hottest decade ever.

Where’s Warren? | Climate Skeptic

Two forces are at work that have, as judging from my email, left my readers confused. The first is the pace of news around climate has accelerated by a factor of at least 10 since the CRU email release. I must admit I really underestimated the impact that release would have — not in how much we would learn, but the impact it had on the media. Suddenly, the media had a narrative they understood (coverup and malfeasance) that somehow allowed them to question catastrophic global warming theory when they were unwilling to do so on the basis of flaws in the science. S0, for example, while the media was unwilling to question the obvious absurdity of the Himalayan glacier forecast in a straight up science discussion, they were able to run with it as a story about organizational failure at the IPCC. Whatever.