Climate Common Sense: Parliamentary Committee Whitewash- "Scientific reputation of Professor Jones and CRU remains intact"

The Irish Times reports that :Scientists at a leading British climate research centre had a culture of withholding information from global warming sceptics but did not deliberately manipulate data to support their case, politicians said today.
The report makes the amazing statement that "The scientific reputation of Professor Jones and CRU remains intact," , making the reader wonder what such a committee would consider enough to damage a Warming scientist's reputation - nothing it would seem!

EU Referendum: It was never going to be any different

It was not set up to do that, it was not competent to accomplish such a task, and the timescale afforded would have, in any case, rendered it impossible. But, despite that, the committee has found precisely that. It will be quoted endlessly by the "warmists" – all the rest is detail. And, in due course, that is what all the other CRU inquiries will find.

Thus, the establishment looks after its own. There are far too many with their fingers in the till for it to have been any different.

OCRegister.com : Editorial: Arnold's global warming ardor cooling

Despite the governor's boast that "California leads the nation" in global warming regulations, he's probably noticed there are fewer following that lead. A prime proponent, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., declared recently cap-and-trade is dead in Congress. New Jersey allowed a law requiring reporting of greenhouse gases to die rather than enforce it, and imposed cost-benefit analyses on other climate regulations. Even the French cancelled their cap-and-trade plan, citing adverse economic effects.

Richard Littlemore | Marc Morano

Esquire still gives Morano 6,500 words of love and attention (the two are one and the same in Morano's denier circles).

Twitter / Don Christie

Steps 1. become a climate change skeptic. Step 2. Let someone know Step 3. Profit...