IPCC propaganda, half truths, bogus science, urban legends about methane | CLIMATEGATE

So what’s all the hype about giving up meat about you may ask? It’s politics, not science. The IPCC is not the place to look for scientific facts. It’s more like the world repository of myths and urban legends.

IPCC Gets a Solid “F” in WSJ Poll | CLIMATEGATE

The D’s and F’s add up to 93.4% who think their work was sub-par.

Watch Out For Self-Censorship At The New York Times « The Unbearable Nakedness of CLIMATE CHANGE

There is an article by John M Broder in the first page of the International Herald Tribune today, that is mysteriously nowhere to be found on their website (the New York Times’). This is very unusual as the IHT normally prints stuff that has already appeared on the NYT a day or two before, and has already been on the website for several hours.

The article’s printed-version title is “Feeling the heat from critics, climate scientists battle back“.

Soil impact underestimated: climate study › News in Science (ABC Science)

Finnish researchers have called for a revision of climate change estimates after their findings showed emissions from soil would contribute more to climate warming than previously thought.